A property has a dozen systems. Each knows a fragment. None knows the whole story of what the property promised — and whether it actually happened.
Not “the AI speaks French” — that’s commoditised. This is a commitment being tracked across a shift change, an escalation before the guest complains, and a complete chain the next person can actually use.
Grounded strictly in this pre-NDA briefing. It will refuse what it shouldn’t answer — that boundary is deliberate, and it’s part of what you’re evaluating.
Twenty-two sections. Pull what you need — nothing here is sequenced for you. §11 is the one that matters: it’s deliberately conservative about what actually exists.
The useful response isn’t enthusiasm. Every known risk is below, each with the test that would disprove the thesis. Flip one. If you can land a blow we haven’t listed, that’s the conversation.
This wasn’t sent to collect enthusiasm. Stage 0 closes with your written critique — the useful reply is the one that stings.
Then: a ninety-minute working session on architecture and role — facts, not titles. If both sides still want it, a mutual NDA and a time-boxed diligence sprint with defined deliverables. The relationship is decided only after the sprint.